Archive of Our Own 您所在的位置:网站首页 a03官方镜像网站 Archive of Our Own

Archive of Our Own

2024-06-18 04:37| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Archive Name: Archive of Our Own Date(s): 2008 – present Archivist: Organization for Transformative Works Founder: Organization for Transformative Works Type: Fanworks archive, currently mainly fanfic Fandom: Multifandom URL: http://archiveofourown.org/, AO3_Status, ao3org Archive of Our Own Logo Click here for related articles on Fanlore. Contents 1 Its Beginnings 2 Timeline 3 Behind-the-Scenes Organization 4 Notable Features 4.1 Collections and Challenges System 4.2 Tags 4.3 Filtering 5 Fanwork Statistics 6 Inclusion of Meta on the Archive 7 No Direct Advertising 7.1 From a 2016 Discussion 8 2019 Hugo Award Win 9 Reactions 9.1 Initial Criticisms Of 9.2 Initial Praise Of 9.3 History: Some 2007/2008 Fan Comments 9.4 History: Some 2016 Fan Comments 10 Racism and the AO3 10.1 Proposed Action 10.1.1 Removal of Racist Fanworks 10.1.2 Additional Warnings 11 Censorship 12 Communities 13 Interviews 14 Further Reading/Meta 14.1 General 14.2 2007 14.3 2009 14.4 2011 14.5 2015 14.6 2016 14.7 2017 14.8 2018 14.9 2019 14.10 2020 14.11 2021 14.12 2022 14.13 2023 15 AO3 Metafandom 15.1 AO3 Tag Appreciation 15.2 AO3 Authors Appreciation 15.3 AO3 Commenter Appreciation 16 Some Old Links 17 References

Archive of Our Own, a.k.a. AO3, is a multi-fandom archive website owned and operated by the Organization for Transformative Works, which largely hosts fanfiction. According to the site's main page, it is "A fan-created, fan-run, nonprofit, noncommercial archive for transformative fanworks, like fanfiction, fanart, fan videos, and podfic."

Archive of Our Own is a "fan-created, fan-run," site which was first proposed in the post An Archive Of One's Own by Astolat in 2007. The post discussed instances in the past when websites and corporations attempted to profit from fandom, fans, and fanworks on their online platforms, while not respecting or protecting fandom. This issue was especially important because transformative fandom has been repeatedly targeted due to the debated legality of fanworks, which involves issues of copyright, intellectual property, and fair use. On the internet, this has led to websites mass-deleting fan accounts, fanfiction, etc. for various content and reasons. Astolat's post and subsequent discussions led to the conclusion that there needed to be a reliable non-profit fanwork-hosting site that was run by people who were themselves fans, and would therefore know what fans wanted and work in the interest of fandom.

AO3 is currently designed to host text-based fanfiction as well as fandom nonfiction and allows embedding (but not yet hosting) for vids, fanart and podfic. Fanworks are protected under fair use. AO3 permits Underage sex, RPF, and other controversial content, as it is intended to be an archive for any and all types of fanworks. The archive's interface is planned to be translated into languages other than English in order to make it more accessible to an international userbase.[1] It requires that DMCA takedown notices be signed in order to be acted upon[2] and says that the OTW "will remove the content upon satisfactory review of the merits of the infringement claim."

Its Beginnings

AO3 was first proposed in May 2007 by Astolat. Her post, An Archive Of One's Own, was one of many in LiveJournal fandom reacting to the commercial startup FanLib, which had tried to recruit some fanfic writers for its new fic archive. LiveJournal fandom was unimpressed by the company's desire to profit off of the popularity of fanfic, not to mention a sales pitch to get buy-in from copyright holders saying things like "All the FANLIB action takes place in a highly customized environment that YOU control" (see File:FanLib info.pdf). Astolat's post An Archive Of One's Own set out some guidelines for a fan-controlled archive in opposition to the dystopian future she saw in FanLib: no ads, no restrictions on content, and a commitment to fic as fair use. To realize this vision, the Organization for Transformative Works was created.

Fans had other (often long-standing) reasons for wanting to help build a new multifandom archive. Strikethrough happened a few weeks after astolat's initial post, driving home the point that it was not safe to rely on commercial entities to preserve fan culture. Around the same time, the Snarry archive Detention vanished literally overnight because of an argument between the owner and one of the mods. This raised awareness that a long-term archive would need to be run by an organization not subject to a single person's whims. See Beginnings of OTW: 2007-08 Comments for more comments regarding AO3 and OTW's creation.

Timeline Main article: Timeline of the Archive of Our Own front page in September 2013 First proposed by Astolat on 17 May 2007 in the post An Archive Of One's Own. A Livejournal community fanarchive was created on 20 May 2007 to coordinate discussion and planning for the creation of the archive.[3][4] The archiveofourown.org domain name was registered 30 May 2007 by Rebecca Tushnet.[5] Call for Ruby on Rails tutorial writers on 1 November 2007.[6] Call for Ruby on Rails Coders on 8 January 2008.[7] Archive opened for closed beta, in which members of the public were welcome to view and comment, but account creation was limited to Organization for Transformative Works staff and testers on 3 October 2008.[8] Archive entered open beta on 14 November 2009. Users are able to get accounts either via a first-come, first-served invitation queue, or via invitation codes distributed to those who helped with closed beta testing. The speed of new account creation depends on the servers' ability to handle increased load.[9] Yuletide 2009 opened on the AO3 on 18 December 2009. All Yuletide participants were given an invitation.[10][11] On 24 December 2009, the AO3 had 4648 fandoms, 33,810 works and 4127 users. Kudos added circa December 2010. New servers added in February 2011.[12] Subscriptions to authors added in March 2011. Database performance issues recurred in September 2011, with administrators blaming them on greatly increased use.[13] As of 5 October 2011, the archive had 7385 fandoms, 228,489 works and 22,974 users. As of 31 December 2011, the archive had approximately 8100 fandoms, 275,000 works and 31,000 users.[14] Database performance issues recurred in May 2012[15] when the site reached 1.4 million unique visitors a month,[16] coinciding with Fanfiction.net's 2012 M-rated Purge.[17][18] The archive began to cache works and stats pages as an immediate measure to decrease server load,[19][20] and then temporarily suspended tag filtering for the same reason,[21] reinstating them with improvements in November.[22] As of 15 July 2012, the archive had 56,203 registered users.[23] As of October 2012, there were 459,655 works and approximately 23,000 fandoms.[24] As of 16 July 2013, the Archive had 763,326 works in 12,448 "canonical" fandoms, and over 183,000 registered users.[25] The one millionth work was posted on 15 February 2014.[26] The archive reached two million fanworks as of 20 December 2015.[27] It was announced on 31 October 2016 that AO3 had 1 million registered users, 2,615,000 works spread across 22,970 fandoms.[28] The archive reached three million fanworks as of 28 April 2017.[29] The archive reached four million fanworks as of 20 July 2018.[30] The archive reached five million fanworks in July 2019. [31] The archive won a Hugo Award for "Best Related Work" on August 18, 2019. Behind-the-Scenes Organization

AO3 is a project of the Organization for Transformative Works. Many OTW committees are responsible for aspects of the project:

Accessibility, Design & Technology (AD&T) and their three subcommittees of Design, Coders, and Testers train AD&T volunteers, design and develop software features, and write and test the code for new features and bug fixes. Systems maintains the servers and infrastructure AO3 runs on. Support answers user help requests, bug reports and feedback submitted via the form on AO3 and forwards abuse reports to the Policy & Abuse Committee. Tag Wrangling organises and maintains the AO3 user-created tags for Fandoms, Characters, Relationships and Additional (freeform) categories. Content Policy is responsible for site content policy and TOS updates in conjunction with Legal. Translation works to translate news posts and work on the new site translations feature in conjunction with ADT. Internationalization and Outreach works to improve support and visibility for international and underrepresented fandoms on the archive. Open Doors helps maintainers of other archives to import their content to AO3. Vidding works on integrating vids into AO3. Communications coordinates newsletters and blog posts on the OTW site and mirrors. Volunteers & Recruiting (VolCom) recruits and looks after volunteers and manages the internal wiki and access to various tools. Development and Membership and Finance fundraise and pay for AO3 hosting and servers. The Board of Directors oversees the Committees.[32] Notable Features The tag system and tag wrangler team. (even inspired fanfic, see also Wrangulator) Built-in bookmarking, with the ability to add reader tags, label a bookmark as a rec, and no limit on the number of bookmarks or recs. The ability to lock a fanwork to registered Archive users only, instead of posting it publicly, known as "archive-locking." Options to view either chapter-by-chapter or the whole work at once. Separate fanworks can be linked as a series. An easy way for creators to orphan works (disassociate their name from a work), providing a reader-friendly alternative to completely deleting fanworks. A clear, minimal and enforceable warning policy, which includes the ability to add additional warnings as searchable tags. One-click download of stories in a variety of formats: PDF, HTML, ePub, and Mobi. The "Kudos" button, a fast, simple, possibly threshold-lowering way for readers to express appreciation for a work. Collections and Challenges System

The collections and challenges system is the set of features that make collections of fanworks (including importing for Open Doors), gift exchanges, prompt memes, and other challenges possible on AO3. Collections and challenges were initially implemented for the Yuletide exchange, as the founder of Yuletide is Astolat, but usage of the features has spread out greatly since it was first implemented for Yuletide 2009, including usage by the AO3/Dreamwidth-based exchange fandom. Other large exchanges include Trick or Treat and Chocolate Box.

Collections have the following features available to all users:

Creating a new collection. Adding new maintainers (moderators or owners) to the collection Adding their own works to a collection they maintain Bookmarking works to a collection they maintain Setting the collection to moderated, so that works be approved by a maintainer before it will show up in the collection) Setting the collection to closed, so that only maintainers can add new works or bookmarks) Setting the collection to unrevealed, so that most of the details about works in the collection are hidden. Setting the collection to anonymous, so that the authors of works in the collection are hidden. There is a specific Anonymous Collection that authors may put their works in to completely anonymize the work while retaining control over it. Marking the collection as a prompt meme or gift exchange Adding a banner, icon, and other information Making the collection a sub-collection of another collection the user owns, making it a "subcollection"

Collections that are also gift exchanges or prompt memes get additional features, such as the ability to run matching or posts prompts.

Tags

The Archive has an innovative system for managing fandoms and other tags that allows uploaders to enter all manner of freeform tags while "tag wranglers" organize and link them so that readers can browse or search. zvi wrote a noteworthy post explaining it.[33]

The AO3 tagging system (and the related search and filtering problems) have not been all joy for all users. See AO3 Tagging Policy Debate for more information on criticism and discussion of AO3's tagging system.

Fanworks have been written about tags and tag wranglers. The fandom tag for tags is AO3 Tags; wrangler RPF is folded into the OTW RPF tag. See AO3 Tag Wrangling for more details.

Filtering This article or section needs expansion. See also: Filtering Tools

AO3 offers extensive filtering options in its "Sort and Filter" sidebar that appears on work list pages (works by a user, works in a collection, or works in a tag). Users can filter to include or exclude a wide range of work metadata, including but not limited to work tags. Both general and fandom-specific filters are available. Filterable metadata types include:

Ratings ("General Audiences", etc.) Archive warnings ("Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings", etc.) Relationship categories (f/f, etc.) Fandom tags (BTS, etc.) Character tags (Martha Jones, etc.) Relationship tags (Kirk/Spock, etc.) Additional tags (Alternate Universe, etc.) Crossovers Completion status Word count Date updated Language

Additionally, users can search for specific words within the filtered results.

The purpose of filtering is to help users more easily find fanworks with specific criteria, and this feature has been celebrated by many fans as one of the benefits of using AO3.

Fanwork Statistics

In August 2013, the percentage of fanworks by relationship category on the AO3 was: 50% M/M, 26% Gen, 22% F/M, 5% F/F, 4% Multi, 2% Other.[34] See more AO3 statistics from destinationtoast[35] and centrumlumina.

In October 2014, the overwhelming majority of works posted on AO3 was fanfiction, with the percentages for other work types being: 0.25% fanvids, 0.71% fanart, 0.17% meta (meta nonfiction and fanfiction), and 0.55% podfic.

Fans doing statistical analysis of fanworks frequently use AO3 data.

Inclusion of Meta on the Archive

The Archive of Our Own TOS FAQ states[36]

You can post any noncommercial, non-ephemeral fanwork.

- What kinds of fanworks can I post?, Content

All three of these points must be true of a work to be allowed under the Terms of Service. Later on it also specifies that the fanwork should be "transformative".

The publication of meta essays on AO3 was not officially permitted until 2013, when the OTW Board of Directors announced that they had voted to allow meta on AO3 "after a long period of discussion".[37] Prior to this decision, meta and fannish non-fiction existed in a somewhat dubious grey area: it was occasionally posted to the site and did not appear to be explicitly forbidden by AO3's Terms of Service,[38] but would often attract flames, angry comments and reports.[39] At one point, AO3 appeared to be taking a stance explicitly prohibiting meta, but the decision was almost as quickly reversed.[40]

In their announcement officially permitting meta, the Board of Directors wrote that,

We considered a range of issues while making this decision, including how this move would fit into the overall mission of the OTW, the technical and financial resources required, and demand from users of the Archive and members of the OTW. We determined that there is already a demand for meta on the Archive, and that this use of our resources is consonant with our purview and mission.

We're aware that this decision has taken some time, and we sincerely apologize for the delay. We had hoped to reach a decision sooner, but the complexity of the discussion meant we needed to think carefully about the issues. As the term of some OTW Board members ended while the discussion was ongoing, we also needed time for the new Board members to get up-to-speed with all the issues involved.[37]

The announcement emphasised that officially permitting meta hosting on AO3 was "just the first step in this journey", adding that the Board and relevant committees would now begin working together to "define exactly how meta will be handled" and "agree on some definitions and policies". The Board also invited feedback on the decision via comments on the news post.

Works which may be classified under the umbrella of "fannish nonfiction", including meta, are now allowed provided they fulfill the other stated requirements (noncommerical, nonephemeral, and fannish) of hosted works.

Fannish nonfiction can be discussions of fannish tropes, essays designed to entice other people into a fandom, commentary on fandoms, hypothetical casting for alternate versions of works, documentaries, podcasts about fandom, explanations of the creative process behind a fanwork or works, tutorials for creating fanworks, guides for fan-created gaming campaigns, or many other things.

Fannish vs Nonfannish

The Archive is dedicated to fanworks in particular, and is not intended to be a repository of all creative works. However, there are a number of works produced by fans that do not fit comfortably into a narrow definition of fanfiction, fanart, vids, or other types of fanworks. Original works that are not based on a [[canon|specific media source (canon)] are welcome on the archive so long as they are fannish in nature.The line between fannish and nonfannish is recognized to be ambiguous. The explicit inclusion of meta in 2013 blurred the the line further in some fan's eyes.

In particular, original fiction that is part of an Open Doors project is allowed, as are types of original fiction and quasi-original fiction produced within a fandom context. Examples include such things as anthropomorfic, original fiction that is produced as part of a fandom challenge, exchange, or charity event, and genres such as Original Slash, Original BL, and Regency romances produced in Jane Austen fandom.

Disallowed nonfannish fiction includes:

Episode transcripts and other non-transformative fandom material; Primarily autobiographical or non-fandom-related essays (e.g., essays on bike lanes, even if they contain a single reference to a fannish source); General complaints about behavior towards a particular creator (e.g., a post stating that a work was deleted due to lack of feedback); Suggestions that other fans contact the creator through email or other social networks; A single word or pairing name repeated hundreds of times; Offers and giveaways.

Discussions of specific fandom-related events such as conventions or debates over particular incidents, may be more appropriate for Fanlore than for the Archive.

Ephemeral vs Non-ephemeral

Ephemeral content is generally meant to be read at a particular time and is not allowed on the Archive. Content disallowed under this requirement include works that are:

A single short sentence A single unedited image, short unedited sound clip, or short unedited video clip A .gif with or without a short caption Messages about a particular challenge A reaction meant to be read while or just after a particular episode airs. Message-board, social media or forum-like requests, such as Notifying of an upcoming work's release or upcoming challenge A request for recommendations for particular kinds of fanworks A list of recommended works on a particular topic Providing or requesting recommendations or help locating a work A description of a challenge for other creators Live-blogged episode reactions, which more appropriately belong on a journaling service

Allowed Content With the addition of fannish nonfiction, such as meta, currently allowed types of works include:

An audio performance of a fannish essay about vampire biology across sources, or the same essay in text form. Photographs of a knitted character. Short clips of footage from existing sources, edited over a song to make an argument or tell a story. A comic telling the romantic adventures of the protagonist of a video game. Photographs of a knitted character. An alternative version of a Jane Austen novel in which there's a zombie apocalypse. The supporting text for an original adventure for a tabletop roleplaying game. No Direct Advertising

Advertising on "Archive of Our Own" is not allowed. This includes mentions by fans of writing commissions and Patreon work.

As stated in the TOS[41]

D. What you can't do:

You agree not to use the Service (as well as the e-mail addresses and URLs of OTW sites):

4. to make available any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising (defined as solicitations for direct or indirect commercial advantage), junk mail, spam, chain letters, pyramid schemes, or any other form of solicitation;

As stated in various parts of the TOS FAQ[42]

In addition, we will enforce the noncommercialization policy strictly, including a ban on works posted to promote the sale of the author's other works, even if those are not hosted on the site.

- Can I archive original fiction?, Spam and Commercial Promotion

That means that [the Archive] isn't the right place for offering merchandise, even fan-related merchandise. Linking to your personal page (not, for example, an Amazon author page) is fine, even if the personal page includes some items for sale, but the Archive is not advertising space.

- How strict is the "no commerce" rule?, Spam and Commercial Promotion

The Archive will host fanworks of any origin, including fanworks created in response to charity drives or other challenges. A link to a charity drive to explain the origin of a fanwork is appropriate. Solicitation itself, however, should take place outside the Archive. We concluded that this policy was the easiest to apply fairly to everyone, given the wide range of possible solicitation activities.

- What about charity drives?, Spam and Commercial Promotion

From a 2016 Discussion

psa: don’t mention commissions/patreon on AO3

Hi guys! So I know we all don’t actually read the terms and conditions of things and just hit agree assuming there’s nothing important in there (I do it too oops) but if you take writing commissions or anything involving money, then there’s actually something in the AO3 terms and conditions to be aware of.

Linking to a personal website or blog/social network where you are taking donations, posting commissions or mentioning published works is permitted, but advertising it directly on the Archive is not, nor is using language which one might interpret as requesting financial contributions. For example, you can say something to the effect of “check out my Tumblr if you want to know more about me and my writing” and include the link to the site, but you cannot specifically state anything about donations, commissions or sales on the Archive.

Today someone reported one of my fics as violating this condition - presumably because I’d mentioned my patreon in the author’s note (I wasn’t actively requesting donations either… I’d literally just mentioned that it existed, and that the fic in question was written as a thank-you for hitting one of my goals).

I’ve written to AO3 to check whether just saying ‘thank you to those who support me on patreon’ is fine and I’ll let you guys know when they get back to me, but if it’s still going too far in terms of being a ‘commercial promotion’ then I’ll just avoid mentioning this in the future! :’)

As I said, someone did actually report my fic for this - so there are people out there who are noticing/reporting these situations. Please be aware of this if you take fic commissions, or use patreon or ko-fi, because your account could end up suspended, which of course no one wants!



【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们

今日新闻

    推荐新闻

    专题文章
      CopyRight 2018-2019 实验室设备网 版权所有